Re: [scc-dev] additional error handling in cc1/error.c

From: Tim Kelly <>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2023 16:24:16 -0400

You guys really have an amazing propensity for making things worse every
time you open your mouths.

I'm done with SCC.

Quentin Rameau wrote:
> Tim Kelly <> wrote:
> Hello sir,
>> Roberto E. Vargas Caballero wrote:
>>> Sorry if the attribution of the patches were lost in some
>>> moment, but we usually don't care so much about these kind of things.
>>> I can understand that they are important for you, but you should
>>> also try to understand that other people have relaxed point of
>>> views and can make mistakes about it. This is what I am trying to
>>> solve now.
>> It doesn't work that way. Integrity might be old-fashioned, but it
>> never goes out of style.
> Please calm down, take a step back,
> and start again in a less agressive way.
> Yes it works that way, solving problems, fixing mistakes.
> The mailing list is here to help improving things,
> so that contribution is more transparent, discussions is public,
> review is done more collectively and validated by several contributors,
> although in the end there's one principal maintainer.
> Integrity is also important to the project, I haven't followed the whole
> commit exchange in question, but if you care about both,
> don't worry about it and please continue participating in it,
> trusting improvement without resentment,
> your input is still welcome!
> Cheers!
> --
> To unsubscribe send a mail to

The Big Picture: Excluding local fishermen so that corporations can sell 
seafood to cat owners in land-locked Manitoba.
To unsubscribe send a mail to
Received on Wed 15 Mar 2023 - 21:24:16 CET

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri 21 Apr 2023 - 16:20:41 CEST